-
It Cannot Be Hearsay if You Said It: Statements of Brokers as Representations of the Insurer in Minnesota
“It Cannot Be Hearsay if You Said It: Statements of Brokers as Representations of the Insurer in Minnesota,” Survey of Insurance Law, TIPS LAW JOURNAL, Vol. 52, 2019.
Read MoreRead More - It Cannot Be Hearsay if You Said It: Statements of Brokers as Representations of the Insurer in Minnesota -
FTC Seeks Comments on Amended Franchise Rule
The Federal Trade Commission has requested public comments on whether to make changes to its rule known as “Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising” (“Amended Franchise Rule) as a part of systematic review of all current FTC rules and guides. Comments must be received on or before May 13, 2019.
Read MoreRead More - FTC Seeks Comments on Amended Franchise Rule -
U.S. Supreme Court Resolves Split over “Wholly Groundless” Exception to Arbitration
Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court in Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., unanimously struck down the “wholly groundless” exception that had been invented by lower courts to defeat arbitration agreement clauses that delegate threshold questions of arbitrability to arbitrators. This is good news for franchisors who rely on arbitration as the franchise system’s chosen method of dispute resolution. The decision is the latest evidence of the law’s continued trend favoring the enforcement of arbitration agreements.
Read MoreRead More - U.S. Supreme Court Resolves Split over “Wholly Groundless” Exception to Arbitration -
8th Circuit Affirms Shareholder-Standing Dismissal and Implied Consent to Entry of Final Order
Read MoreRead More - 8th Circuit Affirms Shareholder-Standing Dismissal and Implied Consent to Entry of Final Order -
A Transfer is Not Fraudulent If Only a Non-Filing Spouse’s Interest in Joint Property is Involved
Read MoreRead More - A Transfer is Not Fraudulent If Only a Non-Filing Spouse’s Interest in Joint Property is Involved -
A Transfer is Not Fraudulent If Only a Non-Filing Spouse’s Interest in Joint Property is Involved
In Seaver v. Noll, Adv. No. 17-4066, 2018 WL 4693813 (Bankr. D. Minn. Sept. 27, 2018), the bankruptcy court held that transfers “executed to prevent the defendant’s property from being caught up in the debtor’s bankruptcy case” were neither constructively nor actually fraudulent. The Court also analyzed each transaction to determine that, except for one miscalculation, the transfers were not otherwise voidable.
Read MoreRead More - A Transfer is Not Fraudulent If Only a Non-Filing Spouse’s Interest in Joint Property is Involved -
Save Your Business: Mediate, Don’t Litigate.
Apart from a public relations nightmare, the single biggest obstacle in the path of a growing company, particularly a small one, is the prospect of a lawsuit.
Read MoreRead More - Save Your Business: Mediate, Don’t Litigate. -
Anti-Poaching Clauses Continue to Draw Focus of State Regulators and Plaintiffs’ Lawyers
On December 20th, the Washington State Attorney General announced that it had reached agreements with another 7 franchisers to eliminate anti-poaching clauses from their franchise agreements, joining 39 others who signed similar agreements with the state earlier in the year.
Read MoreRead More - Anti-Poaching Clauses Continue to Draw Focus of State Regulators and Plaintiffs’ Lawyers -
E-Alert – City of Saint Paul Enacts Minimum Wage
Saint Paul has enacted a phased higher minimum wage ordinance which begins in 2020. The size and type of business determines when the $15 per hour minimum wage applies.
Read MoreRead More - E-Alert – City of Saint Paul Enacts Minimum Wage -
Can an Employer Require that an Employee Who was Involved in a Work-Related Injury or Accident be Drug Tested?
When I prepare a drug and alcohol testing policy for Minnesota clients, they often tell me it is their understanding that although post-accident testing is permitted under Minnesota law, it is prohibited by OSHA. In October 2018, OSHA issued a new memo which clearly states that post-accident testing is permissible.
Read MoreRead More - Can an Employer Require that an Employee Who was Involved in a Work-Related Injury or Accident be Drug Tested? -
Financial Disclosures Complicate Property Tax Appeals
When a property tax appeal is filed on an income-producing property in Minnesota, certain financial disclosures are required to be submitted to the county before Aug. 1.
Read MoreRead More - Financial Disclosures Complicate Property Tax Appeals -
Mind the Gaps
Are you minding the gaps in your construction buy/sell agreement? Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as adopted across the country, may be changing your contract risk exposure.
Read MoreRead More - Mind the Gaps -
What Next, Now That Transportation Fees Have Been Ruled Illegal in Minnesota?
The Minnesota Supreme Court’s ruling in Harstad v. City of Woodbury, that cities do not have authority to charge transportation fees for future road improvements, has answered one big question for developers, but others remain.
Read MoreRead More - What Next, Now That Transportation Fees Have Been Ruled Illegal in Minnesota? -
NLRB Issues Proposed Rule on Joint Employer Status
On Feb. 26, 2018, the board vacated Hy-Brand after an NLRB Inspector General’s report found that a board member should not have participated in the decision because his former law firm represented one of the parties in Browning-Ferris.
Read MoreRead More - NLRB Issues Proposed Rule on Joint Employer Status -
Guest or Tenant?
Bryan Huntington’s article, “Guest or Tenant?” was published in the August 2018 edition of Bench and Bar magazine. The article examines the criteria that courts consider when deciding which persons are protected by Minnesota’s landlord/tenant statutes.
Read MoreRead More - Guest or Tenant? -
Topic 606 – is Your Net Worth (Equity) About to be Decimated?
Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09 Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is in effect now for public companies, and will be effective next year for private companies, generally requires up-front fees to be deferred and taken into income over the term of the franchise agreement.
Read MoreRead More - Topic 606 – is Your Net Worth (Equity) About to be Decimated? -
NASAA Proposes Major Changes to Franchise Disclosure Document Cover Page – Comments Are Due This Week
On June 12, the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) issued a proposal to revise the state cover page to Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs), essentially adding several pages to the beginning of the FDD.
Read MoreRead More - NASAA Proposes Major Changes to Franchise Disclosure Document Cover Page – Comments Are Due This Week -
What Does Dynamex Really Mean For Franchising in California?
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court, 416 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2018), sent shockwaves through California’s business community in May when the court adopted a new standard for classifying workers as independent contractors or employees.
Read MoreRead More - What Does Dynamex Really Mean For Franchising in California? -
Public Employees Cannot be Required to Pay Fair Share Fees
On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Illinois state employee Mark Janus’ challenge of a 1977 Supreme Court case, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education.
Read MoreRead More - Public Employees Cannot be Required to Pay Fair Share Fees -
Judge Decides that the Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time Ordinance Does Not Apply to Employers Based Outside the City of Minneapolis
Judge Mel I. Dickstein ruled that the City of Minneapolis cannot enforce its sick and safe time ordinance against an employer based outside the geographical boundaries of Minneapolis.
Read MoreRead More - Judge Decides that the Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time Ordinance Does Not Apply to Employers Based Outside the City of Minneapolis
Showing all articles