| | Minnesota Employers Cannot Agree To Refrain From Contesting A Claim For Unemployment Benefits By Daniel J. Ballintine The law in Minnesota has long-provided that employers cannot ask employees to waive their rights to unemployment benefits and that any agreement to that effect is void. In the past, however, some employers have offered to refrain from contestin g a claim for unemployment benefits as consideration for an employee’s release of claims in a separation agreement, for example. Although this practice has not been explicitly prohibited under the law, there has been risk associated with it since employers cannot commit fraud in dealings with the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (“DEED”), which administers the state’s unemployment benefits program. For example, an employer cannot lie to DEED and report that an employee was fired when, in fact, he or she voluntarily resigned. To address this issue, employers have often clarified their agreements with employees to provide that while they will not contest a claim for unemployment benefits, they can and will provide truthful information in response to any questions from DEED. This practice may now be purely a thing of the past. To read more, click here.
Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives Exempt from Overtime
By James A. Godwin
One of the most common wage and hour questions companies have is whether their employees are exempt from overtime requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq. (the “FLSA”). The FLSA generally requires the payment of a minimum wage and overtime pay to employees for each hour worked over 40 hours in a week. The FLSA and the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) implementing regulations, however, contain numerous exemptions for workers ranging from highly paid employees to forestry workers. Employers often assume that the exemptions are broader than they are. However, the exemptions are specific and narrow. Many times employers will look at the name of an exemption and determine that a certain class of workers falls under the exemption without further analysis. For examp le, some companies have assumed that the “outside salesman” exemption applies to any salesperson. In reality, each of the exemptions has several specific requirements which must be met.
| | Municipal Bankruptcies May Force Municipal Bondholders to Accept Haircuts By Jay Reding
Most people are familiar with the two most common forms of bankruptcy protection under the Bankruptcy Code – Chapter 7 liquidations and Chapter 11 reorganizations. But like individuals and companies, municipalities can also file for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. Now the city of Stockton, California has become the largest city to file for municipal bankruptcy protection following major municipal bankruptcy filings in Jackson County, Alabama and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. These municipal bankruptcies remain rare, but their numbers are increasing as municipal revenues decline and obligations such as pensions increase. Not only do municipal bankruptcies give us a window into the state of the public sector, but they may impact municipal bondholders as well.
Business Litigation Department Attorneys: