Real Estate & Construction Blog

Property Tax

Truth-in-Taxation Forms—The Other Shoe Drops on Minnesota Commercial Property Owners

Minnesota commercial property owners have been waiting months for the other shoe to drop. The first shoe fell back in March when assessors told owners their estimated market values. The other shoe will drop in the next few weeks when local governments send out their truth-in-taxation forms, informing property owners of their proposed tax rates. Property tax liability is calculated by multiplying the estimated market value by the tax rate, so this will be the first look at what property owners will owe in 2026. Although the taxes you owe next year may seem a long time away, if you think your taxes are too high, now is the time to have someone look at them. While you can’t challenge the tax rate, you may be able to lower the assessed value. Here is a checklist of common indicators that your assessed value is too high: Your estimated market value spiked dramatically compared to the previous year. Your property experienced significant depreciation. Properties similar to yours recently sold for less than the estimated market value listed on your form. You have a recent appraisal report that is less than the value on your truth-in-taxation form. A unique feature of your property makes it less marketable. The property was specially built for your business’s particular use. To raise capital, your business executed a sale-leaseback, and the new value mirrors the sale price. You completed a 1031-exchange, and the new value tracks the 1031 sale price. Unfortunately, the meetings provided on the truth-in-taxation form are not opportunities to change your property’s estimated market value. Although your local assessor may be available to talk at these meetings, by statute, they are unable to make any changes to the value. Instead, you must file a tax petition in court. The deadline to file a petition for the taxes payable in 2026 is April 30, 2026. You should seek advice from a property tax attorney to determine whether you have a potential appeal.

Property Tax

Commercial Landlords Gain Confidentiality of Leases in Minnesota Property Tax Appeals

The Minnesota Tax Court rarely sits en banc, which is when all three judges of the Tax Court decide a matter instead of just one. When they do, it’s to address an issue that is particularly complex or important. The commercial landlord of a downtown Minneapolis office tower, 250 Nicollet Office LLC, filed a property tax appeal. To help value the property, the Hennepin County assessor asked for all the tenant leases. A landlord’s most confidential information are its leases. If competitors know when tenants need to renew their leases and the current terms, they will try to poach those tenants with better terms. In this case, 250 Nicollet Office LLC was willing to provide the leases to the assessor, but it was understandably hesitant to do so without confidentiality. The County refused. To address whether the landlord could produce the leases under a protective order, the judges sat en banc. The Commercial Landlord’s Conundrum—Pursue Tax Relief, but Risk Exposing Confidential Leases to Competitors Commercial landlords in Minnesota face a predicament when bringing a property tax appeal. They want tax relief, but to get it, they potentially expose their leases to their competitors. The source of this risk is a statute unique to Minnesota. The statute requires all income-producing property owners to provide assessors with certain information from their rent rolls. This includes tenant names, base rent, start/end dates and square footage. Failure to produce this information by August 1 results in an automatic dismissal of the case. When the owner provides this information, it is protected under the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act as nonpublic assessor’s data. Although this information is protected from the public, the assessor’s office can use it as part of their official functions, including in appraisal reports for similar properties. That means the assessor could use an owner’s rent roll information as a comparison in an appraisal report to value a competitor’s property, thus exposing the information. But what about when the assessor requests the actual leases? Minnesota statute further provides that assessors can request the actual leases if they believe it is necessary to properly evaluate the property. The landlord then has 60 days to produce them. Unlike the rent roll information where failure to produce the information results in an automatic dismissal, the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure address any failure to produce the leases. In other words, the remedy for failure to produce the leases is left to the court’s discretion, creating several questions. Must Leases Be Produced? The first issue was whether a commercial landlord has to provide the leases when requested. If failure to provide the leases didn’t result in an automatic dismissal like the rent roll information, was it really mandatory? Here, the Tax Court had conflicting rulings. One opinion held that it was mandatory, while another reasoned it wasn’t. Resolving this discrepancy was one of the reasons the court sat en banc. The Tax Court ruled that the plain language of the statute stated that the landlord “must” provide them, thereby making it mandatory. The Tax Court therefore overruled the previous contrary decision on this point. Are Leases Protected? The second issue was whether the leases were subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act as nonpublic assessor’s data like the rent roll information, or if the court could issue its own protective order. If the leases were subject to the Data Practices Act, then the Tax Court had already ruled that it could not issue a protective order because the statute already provided the relevant protection. But the section of the statute governing the leases made enforcement subject to the Rules of Civil Procedure. The Tax Court reasoned that this allowed the court to issue its own protective order. What is the Protective Order’s Scope? The third issue was the scope of the protective order over the leases. The County argued that because leases were part of the same statute requiring landlords to provide certain rent roll information that was protected by the Data Practices Act, the court’s order should provide the same protection and allow assessors to use the leases as part of their normal office functions.  250 Nicollet Office LLC argued that its leases should be limited to this case only. The Tax Court ruled that the leases should receive this-case-only protection, assuring landlords that their leases will not fall into the hands of competitors. Steps Landlords Can Take to Keep Leases Confidential Going forward, if assessors request leases from commercial landlords, landlords should seek an appropriate protective order that limits the use of those leases to the particular case. The times that a commercial landlord has to worry about their leases being exposed to competitors should be as rare as the Tax Court sitting en banc.

Property Tax

I Just Got My Property Tax Assessment—Is the Assessor Out to Get Me?

Assessors have submitted their values and will be sending assessments to property owners in the coming weeks, if they haven’t already. Some property owners may look at their values and wonder, “How can my property possibly be valued this high? Is the assessor out to get me?” The good news is that assessors aren’t out to get you. As a whole, they genuinely want to find the right value. But that doesn’t mean your property was valued correctly. So how could they get it wrong? Mass Appraisal Techniques Can Lead to Over-Assessments There are far too many properties for assessors to inspect individually each year. They must therefore rely on mass appraisal techniques. These techniques are designed to value many properties based on certain, common characteristics. The values that are generated based on those common characteristics are then evaluated by statistical methods. Single-family residential homes offer a good example for how mass appraisal techniques are used. The common characteristics that an assessor might use are the number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms, size of the home, and the home’s location. Using only these common characteristics, assessors arrive at an estimate of the property’s value to calculate property taxes. Because there are a lot of single-family residential homes, the greater volume of data allows for a stronger statistical analysis to arrive at the right value. But what about the other characteristics of your property that aren’t included in the assessor’s model? Or what if your home has unique features? None of these are considered. In general, the more your property differs from the common characteristics used by the assessor, the further off the assessed value will be. Commercial, Multi-Family, and Industrial Properties Are More Prone to Over-Assessments When assessors apply mass appraisal techniques to other property types—such as commercial, multifamily, or industrial properties—there is a greater probability for over-assessments. First, these property types are less uniform, so it becomes more difficult to identify a common set of characteristics that assessors can use to value them as a group. Second, there are fewer of these property types, particularly compared to single-family residential properties, so the statistical analysis is not as robust. With less reliable data, there is a greater chance for over-assessments. An Imprecise Art and Inexact Science Assessing the value of a piece of real estate is a subjective task. There is a popular saying: “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” So too is the value of a property. A recent opinion from the Minnesota Tax Court observed that the appraisal of real estate is both an art and a science. It then quipped that appraisal is “at best an imprecise art” and an “inexact” science. How to Challenge an Over-Assessed Property So if appraising real estate is an imprecise art and inexact science, where does that leave the property taxpayer when faced with an assessed value based on mass appraisal techniques that feels too high? Even though taxpayers will not know what common factors the assessors used for the mass appraisal techniques, they should focus on the individual characteristics of their property. Identify all the characteristics that impact value, and present the data to the assessor. This could include everything from the condition of the heating and cooling systems, conditions of the interior, or any other added features. Additionally, being able to compare your property to a similar property that recently sold can be persuasive. But because valuation is an imprecise art and inexact science, each property will be different. Property taxpayers should watch their values closely each year, and March and April are the ideal times to do so. The deadline to file an appeal to challenge the taxes due in the current year is April 30. At the same time, assessors are sending valuation notices for the taxes payable the following year, and taxpayers have a small window of time to negotiate with assessors before budgets are finalized. You can see the full timeline for a property tax appeal here. Although the assessors are not out to get you, there will always be outliers when mass appraisal techniques are used. Make sure you’re not an outlier paying too much in property taxes.

Property Tax

30 Frequently Asked Questions for Minnesota Property Tax Appeals

Do you feel you are paying more than your fair share in property taxes? If so, you may be able to reduce your taxes or obtain a refund. Here are answers to some of the most common questions we receive about filing a property tax appeal in Minnesota. Property Tax Appeal Essentials What am I appealing when I file a petition? The most common basis for filing an appeal is that the assessed value is higher than the property’s actual market value. A petition to appeal seeks to reduce the assessed value of your property, also known as the estimated market value (“EMV”), to reflect the current market. Are there additional bases for an appeal? Yes, you can also appeal whether your property was misclassified (i.e., residential, agricultural, commercial), whether your property should be exempt from property taxes, or whether it was unequally assessed when compared with similarly situated properties in the applicable area. Can I appeal my property tax rate? No, the tax rate is set by the legislature and local government. How much money can I save with a property tax appeal? Residential property is generally taxed at about 1.0–1.5% of value, and commercial/industrial property is taxed at about 3.0–3.5% of value. That means for every $100,000 in reduced assessed value, a residential property taxpayer saves $1,000–$1,500 in taxes and a commercial/industrial property taxpayer saves $3,000–$3,500. Could the property value go up after filing a petition? Yes, the value can increase, but only if a petition is taken all the way to trial and the judge determines that the property was under-assessed. If the taxpayer does not want to take the risk that the value may increase, the petition can be dismissed at any time before trial and end the case. Initiating an Appeal When is the property value determined? All property is valued as of January 2 for taxes payable the following year. When must a petition be filed? The deadline to file an appeal is April 30 of the year the tax is due. Because property tax appeals are determined by statute, failure to meet this deadline is strictly enforced. Even if you’re a day late, the petition will be dismissed. What if the April 30 deadline falls on a weekend? If the appeal deadline falls on a weekend, you may file the petition on the next business day. Who can file a petition? Anyone who has an interest in the property can bring an appeal. For properties that are leased, appeals are most often filed by the property owner, although tenants can also bring an appeal. But the lease or contract may limit or direct who can bring an appeal. Can I include more than one tax year on a petition? No, the petition can only have one tax year. You must file a separate petition for each new assessment date. Can I include more than one parcel on a petition? Yes, you can include more than one parcel on a petition so long as the owner is the same for each parcel and all the parcels are in the same county. Do I have to take any steps before filing with the Tax Court? No, there are no requirements that a taxpayer must take before filing a petition with the Tax Court. Unlike other jurisdictions, there is no requirement that a taxpayer first appear before the local or county board of appeal and equalization or exhaust any other administrative remedies. Do I need an attorney to file an appeal? It depends. All corporations and limited liability companies with more than one member must be represented by an attorney. Individuals, corporations, or limited liability companies with only one member and partnerships in which the individual is a general partner can represent themselves, but it is recommended that they consult with an attorney. Proving Your Case After I file the petition, does the County have to prove that the value is correct? No, the assessed value is presumed to be correct. It is the petitioner’s burden to overcome the presumption of correctness. How do I overcome the presumption of correctness? The petitioner overcomes the presumption of correctness by presenting evidence that the value is incorrect. Although an owner or other fact witness can offer testimony to overcome this presumption, an appraisal report from an expert is almost always sufficient to overcome the presumption. What happens after the petitioner overcomes the presumption of correctness? After the petitioner overcomes the presumption of correctness, the Tax Court conducts a de novo review of value. In other words, the Tax Court does not give the assessed value any credit, and instead determines the value for itself based on all the evidence in the record. How is the market value determined? The Minnesota courts use the three traditional approaches to value. The sales comparison approach compares your property to similarly situated properties that recently sold in an arm’s length transaction. The cost approach values your property by how much it would cost to replace your property. The income approach values your property by how much income you could generate by renting or leasing the property. After the value from each approach is determined, the three approaches are reconciled against each other to find the EMV. Do I need an expert to determine the EMV? If going to trial, generally yes, an expert is needed. While the value of the property can be determined by the property owner or non-expert witness, they must present evidence that allows the Tax Court to conduct the three approaches to value. Because this is a complex and technical analysis, an expert appraisal report is typically required to present the three approaches to value. What Happens at Trial How likely is it that I will go to trial? Almost all cases settle. Generally, the Tax Court receives several thousand property tax petitions per year, and only a handful of cases go to trial. Who testifies at trial? Typically, the only witnesses in a valuation case are the expert appraisers. How do experts present their opinions at trial? During trial, the appraisal report serves as the expert’s direct testimony at trial regarding their opinions. The expert is not allowed to provide testimony on direct examination unless approved by the Court. Because the expert’s report serves as their direct testimony, depositions of the experts are not typically conducted. Who decides my case? All property tax appeals are decided by the Minnesota Tax Court, which is an executive-branch court. Your case will be decided by one of the three Tax Court Judges appointed by the Governor. There are no jury trials in Tax Court. Timeframe of an Appeal How long does it take to resolve an appeal? The process usually takes 1.5–2 years, but the process can take longer if subsequent tax years are consolidated. After a petition is filed, the Tax Court issues a scheduling order with a trial date typically set for about 1.5 years after filing. You can see the full timeline of the process here. Can I reduce my property taxes without filing a petition? There is a small window of time to reduce your assessed value without filing a petition. Taxpayers receive their valuation notices in March for the taxes payable the following year. But taxpayers only have until the end of June before the counties finalize their budgets and lock in the assessed values. After this roughly 3-month window closes, the only way to reduce your assessed value is by filing a petition. This 3-month window is different for every county, so you must look at your valuation notice for the meeting date of your local board of equalization and appeal. Pitfalls to Property Tax Appeals in Minnesota If I filed an appeal, do I still need to pay the property taxes while the appeal is pending? Yes, all property taxes must be paid as they come due, otherwise it results in an automatic dismissal of your appeal. If a payment is missed, an appeal can be maintained with prompt payment. If I pay my property taxes and obtain a reduction, what happens? If you have paid your property taxes and obtain a reduction, the county will issue a refund of the overpayment with interest. Who is required to make mandatory disclosures? Taxpayers challenging the assessed value of their property who are income producing must provide certain information by August 1 of the year the taxes are due. Although the statute does not define “income producing,” courts have determined that where the owner and occupier are different entities and valuable consideration flows between them, the property is income producing. Classic examples are apartment buildings or office buildings with multiple tenants. But the courts have applied an expansive definition of what constitutes “income producing,” so a taxpayer should err on the side of disclosure. If a property is owner-occupied and does not generate income, then no disclosures are required. What must be provided to the assessor as part of the mandatory disclosures? The statute requires the taxpayer to provide financial statements, rent roll, identification of all lease agreements, net rentable square footage, and a budget. The actual leases must be provided only if requested by the assessor. What if the taxpayer does not provide all the information by August 1? The statute does not provide any opportunity to cure a deficiency in the mandatory disclosures, so failure to make full disclosures results in an automatic dismissal. The Tax Court and Minnesota Supreme Court strictly enforce this deadline, no matter how small the deficiency and regardless of whether the county was prejudiced. Can the information from the mandatory disclosures be kept confidential? The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act classifies documents provided to the assessor through the mandatory disclosures as non-public assessor’s data, which means that the documents are not subject to a request under the Freedom of Information Act. But the assessors can use the information they received for other assessment duties. If the taxpayer is concerned about maintaining other information as confidential, the Tax Court will enter an appropriate protective order.

Real Estate

Bill Griffith and Adam Pabarcus Moderate at Bisnow's Twin Cities State of the Market Event

Larkin Hoffman's attorneys Bill Griffith and Adam Pabarcus recently moderated panel discussions during Bisnow’s Twin Cities State of the Market outlook event. Held earlier this month, the event featured insightful conversations with leaders in the Twin Cities real estate and development markets. The first panel, moderated by Bill Griffith, included Pat Barrett, COO of Oppidan Investment Company; Tim Elam, Managing Director at Scannell Properties; and Barry Stoffel, Partner and Integrator at Gardner Builders.  The four covered a range of topics including strategies for navigating the current market and some of the challenges to various asset classes including industrial space, data centers, and senior housing.  Pat Barrett remarked optimistically, "Winds are shifting, and we're headed in the right direction," when discussing emerging trends in the Twin Cities. Adam Pabarcus moderated the event's final panel which included Josh Brandsted, President of Greco Properties; Jay Bhakta, Managing Partner at JR Hospitality; and Angela Ledding, Head of Underwriting at PACE Sloan Group. The panel focused on the future prospects for the Twin Cities real estate market. "We're witnessing significant economic volatility, impacting every facet of property development and management," noted Adam. Discussions centered on the resurgence of office space demand as the city adapts post-COVID-19 lockdown, as well as identified avenues for future growth. Bill Griffith and Adam Pabarcus are both part of Larkin Hoffman's real estate team.  Recently, Bill sat down with Adam and another attorney on the team, Tim Rye to discuss property taxes.  If you would like to learn more about property taxes in how today's market may be affecting your value, please visit the Larkin Hoffman Real Estate Podcast and listen to our latest episode.  Bill Griffith advises local and national clients on legal and policy issues affecting land use, zoning, real estate, environmental review, municipal law, regulatory matters and government relations. He has been legal counsel to Mall of America in all its phases, and serves as city attorney for the city of Columbus. He is a trusted advisor on real estate development and public funding for both private clients and municipalities. Adam Pabarcus is a litigator and trial attorney who focuses his practice on complex real estate litigation and property tax appeals. Adam represents clients in state and federal courts across the country to resolve disputes and advance their business goals on a broad range of issues. Tim Rye is a litigator who advises clients on real estate valuation and property tax appeals. He advises on all aspects of the property tax appeal process, including: reviewing properties for potential success on appeal, filing appeals and all statutory disclosures, researching market data, preparing analyses for negotiations, negotiating resolutions, and litigating appeals if necessary. Tim represents a broad range of clients, including real estate investors, owners, developers, property and asset managers, corporations, and individuals with real estate holdings.

Property Tax

Property Taxes High? Your Property Could Be Over Valued. Find Out More on The Larkin Hoffman Real Estate Podcast.

There is a simple formula that is used to determine how much you owe in property taxes, however if your property is valued incorrectly, you could be overpaying.  Tim Rye and Adam Pabarcus from our property tax appeals team recently sat down with Bill Griffith to discuss the property tax appeals process and to highlight the benefit of a quick periodic review to determine if your tax assessment is fair.  In this episode of The Larkin Hoffman Real Estate Podcast, Tim also shares insights regarding his team’s recent victory in the Minnesota Supreme Court and its decision to require tax assessors to exclude the airport’s concession fees from rent-based valuations for property tax purposes. The case offers a flight plan to lower taxes at many of the nation’s transportation hubs and underscores the importance for all taxpayers to exclude business value from taxable property value. In this episode, Tim details the magnitude of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision regarding concession fees and how it could influence the results of future property tax appeals. The deadline to file a petition for the upcoming tax season is quickly approaching and taking charge of your tax rate can be as easy as a quick complementary annual checkup.  Contact our property tax appeals team to schedule your review. Bill Griffith advises local and national clients on legal and policy issues affecting land use, zoning, real estate, environmental review, municipal law, regulatory matters and government relations. He has been local counsel to Mall of America in all its phases and serves as city attorney for the city of Columbus. He is a trusted advisor on real estate development and public funding for both private clients and municipalities. Contact Bill Griffith at wgriffith@larkinhoffman.com. Tim Rye is a litigator who advises clients on real estate valuation and property tax appeals. He advises on all aspects of the property tax appeal process, including reviewing properties for potential success on appeal, filing appeals and all statutory disclosures, researching market data, preparing analyses for negotiations, negotiating resolutions, and litigating appeals if necessary. Tim represents a broad range of clients, including real estate investors, owners, developers, property and asset managers, corporations, and individuals with real estate holdings. Contact Tim Rye at trye@larkinhoffman.com. Adam Pabarcus is a litigator and trial attorney who focuses his practice on complex real estate litigation and property tax appeals. Adam represents clients in state and federal courts across the country to resolve disputes and advance their business goals on a broad range of issues. Contact Adam Pabarcus at apabarcus@larkinhoffman.com. Our real estate and construction law team  covers every facet of real estate and its development phases. With the aim of offering distinctive perspectives on emerging topics, trends, and matters within our industry, we launched The Larkin Hoffman Real Estate Podcast to complement The Larkin Hoffman Real Estate and Construction blog. We stay on top of developing issues and legislation and collaborate with industry leaders to ensure our readers and listeners stay abreast of pivotal issues.

Property Tax

Fair Property Taxes to Avoid Overpaying

Businesses face any number of headwinds. High interest rates, inflation, work shortages, and supply chain problems are just a few. Don’t let this list include overpaying on your property taxes. As the saying goes, the only certain things in life are death and taxes. But that doesn’t mean you have to accept your property taxes blindly. The amount of property taxes you pay is based on a percentage of your property’s estimated market value. If the property is overvalued, then you are paying unnecessary tax on that extra value. Factors Leading to Overvaluations: Mass Appraisal Techniques and the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic Assessors set a property’s estimated market value using a system referred to as mass appraisal. At its essence, mass appraisal uses statistical analysis to compare your property to similarly situated properties. Mass appraisal is most effective when there are large sets of properties that have highly similar characteristics, such as single-family residential. But it is less accurate when there are fewer similar property types in the surrounding area, your property has unique features, or it is built-to-suit. Properties that are generally more difficult to value include retail, industrial, and commercial properties. For taxes payable in 2024, there are additional factors leading to overvaluations. As we emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in the economy and the way businesses will continue to operate are coming into focus. The shift to remote and hybrid work schedules is causing a much higher vacancy rate in office space, yet assessors seem to be valuing office buildings the same as they did pre-pandemic. Should You Appeal Your Property Taxes? How do you know if your property taxes are too high? Indicators that you might be paying too much in property tax include: You know similar properties to yours recently sold for less than the estimated market value (“EMV”) listed on your property tax notice. You have a recent appraisal report that is less than the EMV on your property tax notice. The EMV of your property increased dramatically from the previous year. A unique feature of your property makes it less marketable. The property was specially built for your business’s particular use. To raise capital, your business executed a sale-leaseback and the new EMV mirrors the sale price. You completed a 1031-exchange and the new EMV tracks the 1031 sale price. Your property has experienced significant depreciation. To know whether your property is overvalued, you should consult a local property tax appeal attorney. In Minnesota, property is valued as of January 2 for taxes payable the following year. The deadline to file an appeal is April 30 of the year the taxes are due. Failure to meet this deadline is an absolute bar to challenge that particular year’s taxes. To lessen any headwinds your business may be facing, consult with an attorney to make sure your property taxes are fair.